Coalition of City Unions Makes Consessions Again New Contract

Yes, I know here we are again, again.

Seemingly every year the Coalition of City Unions gives back members benifits to the CAO and Mayor after threats of layoffs and furloughs and tsunamis and whatever else they can pull out of their….

Not to be outdone, the Coalition and SEIU have brought us yet a new contract, and more years of slavery to a union who has not once said anything but how much when Eric Garcetti or Miguel Santana come calling.

Unlike the rest of modern society, we give when we have a fully valid contract in place.

EAA can at least claim they had no choice SEIU actually went looking to make givebacks.

This is the latest in the givebacks we have come to expect from SEIU & the Coalition.

 

Coalition Of City Unions Concessions March 24 

2011

Proposed Contract Amendments, Charts, Facts, Lacers. Givebacks Part IV

 

 

 

New Concession Agreement Highlights

 

Contract Facts & Highlights

 

 

Ø This proposal will be rushed for a vote and immediate implementation is required to prevent any legal challenges.

 

Ø NO legally binding contract language has been made available.

 

Ø City Charter takes precedence.

 

Ø Nearly doubles how much the city takes out of your paycheck for retirement from 6% to 11%

 

Ø Removes furloughs for the few remaining classifications on furloughs 4 Days remaining in current fiscal year. (Street Services Removal Pending)

 

 

 

 

Ø Makes exact same claim as last several broken contracts of No Furloughs & massive layoffs if no vote threatened again.

 

 

Ø Mandatory Furloughs Renamed to Holiday Shutdown 4 per year scheduled in December.

 

 

Ø End Cash Overtime All Time Booked CTO Till July 01, 2014

 

 

Ø No Step Increases in pay for employees below Top Step till July 01,2012

 

Remember Los Angeles City Controller Wendy Gruel was quoted as saying, “Furloughs reduce services while achieving no employee benefits costs savings”

 

Let’s review the last few years history.

10/20/2010 Bob Schoonover President, SEIU 721

“But the changes proposed by the city go much farther: raising the retirement age from 55 to 60, reducing annual increases in pension payments and contributing 2% to retiree health care.”

 

8/12/2010 SEIU721 Action Center

City Budget Update: Protecting City Workers’ Health Benefits

Here are answers to some questions you might be asking.

 

What did CAO Miguel Santana propose for city workers?

Here are the changes Santana is trying to impose on city workers:

Increase HMO office visit co-payments from $10 to $20

Increase the emergency room visit co-payment from $50 to $100

Eliminate the $7.50 per pay period Flex Credit; and,

Establish a uniform, 30-day supply, prescription drug co-payment structure for all plans ($10 Generic, $20 brand name on Formulary, and $40 brand name off Formulary).

Will SEIU and the Coalition of LA City Unions accept this proposal?

Absolutely not. The benefit changes Santana seeks could end up costing the City more than they save. The new federal health care reform act grandfathers large benefit plans as long as no substantial changes are made to the plan. If enacted, Santana’s proposal would jeopardize LA’s grandfather status and risk triggering costly benefit mandates required by the federal law.

Didn’t most members of the Engineers & Architects Assn. (EAA) recently reject a similar proposal to pass additional health costs onto City employees?

Unfortunately, EAA, apparently working with City officials, has decided to ignore its members vote and is conducting another mail ballot vote on the same contract proposal. Coalition members continue to be alarmed that another city union would collaborate with the CAO to drive down the quality of benefits for all city workers.

 

7/28/2010 SEIU721 Action Center – Via Email

We Need Your Help to End LA City Furloughs

“On July 1, 2010, the City of Los Angeles adopted a budget that imposed 26 furlough days on many SEIU Local 721 members. Our agreement with the City of Los Angeles prohibits the unilateral implementation of furloughs for any SEIU Local 721 member represented by the Coalition of LA City Unions during the current fiscal year 2010-11. SEIU 721 and other Coalition of LA City Union members across the city are filing group grievances to help end these service cuts.

 

2/18/2010 SEIU 721 Action Center – It’s Time for Leadership, not Layoff Threats

“Dear SEIU 721 Members,

Today, the City Council voted 9-3 to authorize the elimination of up to 4,000 civilian, police and fire employees. After July 1, that could include SEIU 721 members at our parks, animal shelters, yards, golf courses, zoo and across the city. “

Bob Schoonover
SEIU 721 President

 

2/12/2010  Update SEIU Action Center Email

LA City workers will attend budget deliberations in full force on Tuesday, Feb. 16, and Wednesday, Feb. 17, to provide a voice of reason to Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s latest call to lay off more than 3,000 employees.

 

10/23/2009 SEIU 721 and the Coalition Ratify Early Retirement and Coalition Agreements

 

SEIU 721 and four of the other Coalition unions made their voices heard by ratifying the agreements that move forward with early retirements instead of massive layoffs and preserve hard-won protections against furloughs and layoffs for the rest of this fiscal year and next…

Now long-time workers can retire with dignity, protecting those beginning their careers with the City who were especially vulnerable to layoffs.

This agreement puts the City and Coalition members in the best position possible going forward in this tough economy by giving the City long-term, structural savings of $267 million next year and over $2 billion in the next five years; by securing the pension system; and by keeping the Coalition engaged in monitoring the City’s budget and finances.

 

The City Council is expected to take its second vote on the ERIP and Tentative Agreement on Friday, October 30. Sign up for ERIP now! It’s anticipated that the 45 day window period for ERIP will open shortly after the Council’s 2nd vote. Don’t wait to retire! The ERIP ordinance establishes waiting lists. Workers eligible for ERIP are encouraged to get on the list right away.  All provisions of the Tentative Agreement will take effect immediately. That includes the 3.5 hours off each pay period.

 

 

10/19/2009  LA City Members: Remember to Vote for Your FutureSEIU Local Action Center –  “If the members of SEIU 721 and the Coalition of LA City Unions vote no, the City will proceed with its plan to layoff between 926 and 3,000 workers; and implement between 26 and 43 furlough days; through the end of this fiscal year. For next year, the City will lose over $200 million in savings they would gain from the ERIP. They will have to make up that savings with more layoffs and furloughs.”

10/09/2009  SEIU Local Action Center “See how the Coalition Agreement will affect your bottom-line” Three Scenarios, Three Different Impacts: Your Choice No matter how you vote there will be an immediate impact.

If you vote NO, then according to the CAO on October 5 it could mean up to 43 furlough days of Coalition members this year in combination with up to 3,000 layoffs. This would mean a 20.9% cut in your paycheck for the rest of the year.

If you vote NO the City is moving forward with layoff lists and furlough plans for the Mayor’s previously announced immediate implementation of 26 furlough days and 926 layoffs. Even under this plan your paycheck for the rest of the year would be cut by 10.4%.

 

If you vote YES to the Coalition Agreement, your paycheck would be cut only 4.4% for the rest of the year (or only a 2.9% cut from your annual salary).

10/2/2009 The Choice is Yours Today the Coalition of LA City Unions and the CAO finalized language for the Amended Letter of Agreement which Coalition members will vote on in the coming weeks. The Bargaining Teams for every Coalition union recommend a Yes vote on the agreement.

So there are now two very different plans for addressing this year’s budget crisis taking parallel tracks through the City. The choice between them is yours:

  • The Mayor’s plan of 926 immediate layoffs, and furloughs cutting 208 hours of work for those remaining–leaving everyone in a much worse position next year.
  • Our plan centered around early retirements, with concessions including 59.5 hours of work cut this fiscal year, plus ongoing savings to put us in a much better position for the future
  • Better Way Agreement: This only amends the previously ratified “Better Way for LA” Agreement, maintaining protections against layoffs and furloughs this year and next through deferring raises for two years; plus the added 1.75% cash payments on November 1, 2011 and November 1, 2012, and the extra 1.75% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) on July 1, 2013.
  • Coalition negotiators found ways to temporarily bridge the $78 million budget gap, while impacting workers and services as little as possible:
    • $24.6 million from postponing the first ERIP cash payment until next fiscal year.
    • $34.0 million in accounting adjustments and delaying some payments:
      • Deferring sick leave payout for those who’ve earned over 800 sick hours to August 2010

§  Only $19 million of the $78 million bridge is in real cuts of 59.5 hours of work only through the end of this fiscal year–significantly less than the 208 hours cut under the Mayor’s plan.

Do not fall for critics who call these items major givebacks. There are real concessions here, but by agreement they are one-time adjustments, for this fiscal year only, and the majority are only delays that will be repaid. In all, the plan costs workers much less than the alternative plan, and puts us in a significantly better position to prevent more drastic cuts next year and in the future.

September 23, 2009

Fellow LA workers: “Together we’re all facing a big choice, between two very different paths for our City and our membership:

§  Immediate massive layoffs and 26 furlough days in nine months, or

  • No layoffs and no furloughs, voluntary early retirements (ERIP) for 2,400 people, plus a package of small concessions and payments put off to next fiscal year.

What it means if we vote no on the new agreement:

  • It means approximately a 13% pay cut, though we’d get about a 5% raise back, so that’s about a net 8% cut.
  • For more than 900 people on the layoff list it’s a 100% cut.

We all have to remember, these payments we’d put off to the next fiscal year and these small concessions all go away at the end of this fiscal year, which is the last day of June, 2010.

Bob Schoonover  Heavy Duty Equipment Mechanic, City of Los Angeles  President, SEIU Local 721”

 

 

7/22/2009 Bob Schoonover  City Workers in Solidarity Overwhelmingly Ratify the Better Way for LA to Save City Services

“I wanted to tell you that all of our hard work on a Better Way for LA has paid off. City workers represented by SEIU 721 and the five other unions in the Coalition of LA City Unions voted to preserve services for City residents, as well as job and wage security for ourselves and our co-workers, to see our City through this crisis to better times.     This agreement is the product of more than a year of hard work. It saves the services we proudly provide every day. It averts mandatory furloughs that would have cut our wages by 10%; it averts layoffs, and provides early retirement incentives for some of our most dedicated long-term City workers. It helps our younger workers continue to support their families and build lasting careers with the City. It guarantees that all Coalition members will maintain a solid, reliable income through this economic downturn. It helps keep our City working without the shock of massive layoffs.” Bob Schoonover

06/19/2009

Julie Butcher 7:38 PM – June 19, 2009 ”This week I, along with Cheryl Parisi of AFSCME, Daniel Villao of the Building and Construction Trades, Victor Gordo of LIUNA 777, Carlos Rubio of the Teamsters and Lance Bedolla of the Operating Engineers have met with the Mayor, the Mayor’s staff, the Executive Employee Relations Committee (EERC), interim City Administrative Officer Ray Ciranna and Chief Legislative Analyst Gerry Miller to discuss a detailed framework that would prevent mandatory furloughs and layoffs and provide early retirement incentives for those who have given decades of service to the City.
We’re working around the clock today, and will continue through the weekend if necessary. Our goal is for the Executive Employee Relations Committee (EERC) to authorize a package on Tuesday morning so it can come before SEIU and Coalition bargaining teams that afternoon. Additionally, the Los Angeles City Employees’ Retirement System (LACERS) will meet on Monday to discuss a City proposal regarding early retirement incentives.”

 

 

Pension Changes

Ø Defined benefit based on formula:

Final Compensation x Service Credit x 2.16%

 

Ø 2.16% factor has not changed since 1975

 

 

Current Pension 

System

Proposed Additional Pension Deduction With  ERIP Penalty Total 

Deductions*

-6% of salary -4% of salary -1% of salary -11% of salary
*Retirement Deductions are made Bi-weekly so the loss is felt twice a month.

 

 

 

LAFD Current Members Civilians Current
Eligibility requirements for full retirement allowance:
A minimum 50% pension at age 50 with 20 years service and maximum  90% pension with 33 years service; 

 

Age 55 or older with at least 30 years of City Service 

Age 60 or older with at least 10 years of Continuous Service

100% of Final Compensation Requires approximately 46.3 years of City Service

• Required employee contributions of 8% or 9% of salary with 

NO contributions for retiree health benefits; and

 

Currently  6% 

Erip Penalty increases to 7%

• A pension based on the single highest year salary • A pension based on single highest year salary

 

 

 

Contract Modifications – Deferrals

Effective 

Date

Original Provision Givebacks  2011
4/11 N/A -2% Pension
7/11 

2.25 % + 0.25% 

2.25% - 2.0% = 0.25%

11/11 

1.75 %  Cash 

 

0.00%
1/12 

2.75 % 0.00%
7/12 

4.0%  

2.25%+1.75%=4.0%

2.25%*
11/12 

1.75 %  Cash 0.00%
1/13 

2.75 % 0.00%
7/13 

Contract Expired 1.75%* COLA
1/14 Contract Expired 5.5%**Highly Unlikely
Total 11.75% Permanent                + 3% Ca$h 9.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

LACERS FACTS

Who is Eligible for a LACERS Health Plan?

 

You may participate in a LACERS health plan if you receive a monthly retirement allowance, a continuance or a survivorship allowance from LACERS.

 

Ex-spouses and ex-state registered domestic partners being paid their community property interest in a retired member’s benefits are not eligible.

 

Eligible Dependents

Your dependents may receive coverage under a LACERS health plan.

Eligible dependents include your:

  1. Spouse
  2. Domestic Partner (your partnership must be registered with LACERS or state registered)
  3. Dependent unmarried children under age 19
  4. Dependent unmarried children under age 25 who are full-time students in an accredited college, university, or vocational school
  5. Disabled dependent children unable to engage in any gainful employment because of their mental or physical disability (the disability must occur prior to age 19 or if a ful-time student prior to age 25)
  6. Grandchildren – If you or your spouse/domestic partner are the legal guardians or have legal custody of your grandchild; of if your grandchild is the child of a dependent child as defined in (c) (d) or (e) above.

 

Dependent children include:

  1. A child born to you
  2. Your legally-adopted child
  3. Your step-child living with you in a parent-child relationship
  4. A child of whom you have legal custody or are the legal guardian, and you provide principal financial support for that child
  5. Your domestic partner’s child

When I retire, will my spouse/domestic partner also get a retirement check?
An eligible spouse or qualified domestic partner will receive a minimum of 50% continuance upon your death. Your spouse must be married to you at least one year prior to your effective date of retirement, on the date of retirement, and at time of death. For your qualified domestic partner to receive this benefit, you must have an affidavit of qualified domestic partnership on file at LACERS at least one year prior to your effective date of retirement which must still be in effect on the date of your retirement and at time of death.

 

 

Street Services Employees Furloughs To Continue In Los Angeles

In Storm battered Los Angeles, Bureau of Street Services Interim Director Nazario Sauceda faced off with the CAO at City Hall Wednesday over employee furloughs and the use of Surplus funds in the bureau.

In January, Jose Huizar introduced a Motion to exempt employees performing work which was funded by Measure R, Gas Tax, and other Special Restricted Revenue sources.

Watch the entire exchange in the video below

Committee after committee.

In the last few weeks both the Personnel Committee as well as the Budget and Finance committee recommended the Furlough Exemption of All Resurfacing & Reconstruction Division Employees performing Resurfacing work. This would include our Field Personnel Crews Such as 252, 254, 152, 154, & others. Asphalt Plant employees, Trucking Support for both Zones I & II, Management such as Supervisors & Superintendents, and the General Superintendent of the Resurfacing & Reconstruction Division. Associated with this Should be the Coordinating, and engineering positions related to the above activity’s.

In the Street Maintenance Division, that would include Pothole Crews, Division Supervisors, Area Superintendents, and the Street Maintenance General Superintendent because they are funded by both the Measure R Local return as well as the Gas Tax. Miguel Santana the CAO recommended the same, exact personnel may be calculated differently. Slurry Division personnel is unknown as overlay projects are Qualifying under certain tax funding but not under others, as are the streets on which they work.

Street Sweeping

is only Partially funded by Measure O, Wastewater/Stormwater. Bureau of Street Services does not control the majority of that fund, Sanitation does. Another argument has been that Street Sweeping is a revenue generating activity, although it does generate revenue from parking citations, the CAO found the argument to be insufficient to satisfy the exemption requirement. Obstacles to removing Street Cleaning from furloughs are clear, the CAO has told the council they need to maintain a larger reserve fund and money is going to be swept from our surplus to do that.

 

Urban Forestry Division

Funding for the Street Tree Division is mostly general fund money, however the service they provide is so essential that they may be removed from furloughs due to the recent storm activity. Currently Los Angeles is suffering the effects of the budget cutbacks in the Street Tree Division as only Approximately 80 employees remain to maintain and oversee the Largest urban Forest in the WORLD!

 

 

Solutions

It is my belief that money could be used to remove Street Cleaning & Street Tree from furloughs reducing the transfer to the Reserve Fund as the CAO request, and/or supplementing that with money from the Storm Fund dependent on the balance in that account. It should be very easy to take any funds in the Special Event Fee Waiver fund to remove furloughs from all Street Service Employees.

This situation must be approached cautiously, the more personnel are added the higher the risk of having Huizars motion simply Fail. Another issue of concern is the return of people who are assigned to Street Maintenance duties but loaned to Street Cleaning, according to the Director an estimated 60% of people are working Above classification in the Bureau. Very Few people will volunteer to Sub Sweep if they can be removed from furloughs as are the people associated to Street Maintenance who do not perform “Pothole Repair” as required for Measure R etc..

 

Tensions are high as many on the council feel an obligation to increasing the reserves, and having Street Services remain on furloughs, others clearly see the need for the removal of furloughs from the Bureau and the devastating effects they have on the Core Services people expect and deserve in Los Angeles.

 

Keep in mind the following, We have a Surplus, more then enough to take every member of Street Services off of furloughs not just for the remainder of the year, but it could be done twice over.  How will the Bureau respond to the special Council requests and the Mayoral requests for service when the people on duty are not funded for that task?

Finally Councilman Bill Rosendahl not only threw the entire Board of Public Works under the bus he seemingly backed up and ran over them again asking where they were and why they were not standing up for the Bureau!

Lets Take a look at the CAO’s Plan for Street Services funds from his Report:

Public Works, Street Services

After accounting for interim appropriations and reimbursements anticipated later in the fiscal year and with the approval of recommendations contained within the report, a net year-end surplus of $16 million in special funds, including Gas Tax, Proposition C and Proposition 1B funds, is projected for the Bureau.

The timely receipt of anticipated reimbursements will be monitored to ensure a balanced budget at fiscal year-end The Bureau has stated that it will not be able to meet its revised goal to resurface 235 miles. The goal was lowered in the Second FSR, when the Bureau transferred $5.6 million to the Department of General Services (GSD) to replace lost General Fund appropriations with a corresponding reduction of 16 fewer miles for the resurfacing program.   Approximately $2.78 million in Gas Tax savings were identified to reimburse the General Fund for related costs as approved in the Alternative Plan for the P3 Concession Agreement report (C.F. 10-0139-S2).   The Bureau recommended using $2.5 million in Gas Tax savings to exempt all staff from furloughs. A CAO report recommending exempting only resurfacing and pot-hole repair staff was submitted to Council.

The CAO report also recommended that $7 million in Gas Tax savings be used to reimburse the General Fund for employee related costs and avoid the need for five additional furlough days for all General Fund employees*.

*this number was reduced to 1 additional furlough day for Most civilian employees after using “New Math” Today.

-Watch the video below if you have Microsoft Silverlight.

Get Microsoft Silverlight

 

Stephen Box Earns LA City Workers Endorsement for LA City Council District 04

We are proud to endorse Stephen box over incumbent Tom Labonge in the Race for Council District 04.

We have made this decision after careful review of Tom Labonge’s record against providing services equally and fairly to all residents.

Stephen Box

His abuse of Public power, his disregard for legal contracts, his utter contempt for working people and his lack of knowledge about Public Works issues.

Stephen box is a breath of fresh air who understands the need to maintain the public infrastructure for everyone.

After so long in office he hasn’t learned a thing.

His lack of understanding of the Department of Public works and what works and why is shocking for as long as he has been in City Hall one would assume that he would have learned a thing or two, but sadly he turns to Chicago for ideas on how one should run public services.

In the video below you will see employees not of city forces, but of Tom Labonges office dumping at a city facility debris that was carried away at no charge for select homeowners who have the right connections

These items are the responsibility of the Department of Sanitation, however the employees dressed like City workers dump at a Street Maintenance facility, the cost to transport & dump these items come out of Street Services funds and result in fewer streets getting resurfaced and employees having to take furlough days resulting in more potholes and more trash in the streets.

Hollywood hills residents might care to know about his slashing of funds and furloughing workers resulting in overgrown vegetation, potholes, mudslides and other quality of life issues.

Finally great suspicion surrounds the installation of a traffic signal just feet away from his district office which had been completed for months yet not activated until after the campaign season began. The pressure city engineers were under from his office to approve the installation only a block from another traffic signal.

Shame on you Mr. Labonge for hiring high paid staff to cater to a select few carting away their trash at the expense of ALL city residents.

Is Corruption a good model to follow?

Tom Labonge gets his Public Works idea’s for running the second largest city in the country directly from the most corrupt city in the country Chicago,  Mr. Labonge needs a lesson not only in Public Works 101 but a follow-up from the Ethics Commission!

Further adding to the mess better known as Tom Labonge, his ill advised Motion to transfer Street cleaning to the control of Sanitation shows how out of touch his thinking is.

Tom Labonge will only continue to fail the average resident as has been proven over the last year.

We hope you will give Stephen Box the chance to work for you as the next councilman of the 4th District.

Ron Kaye Chimes In

If we haven’t given you enough reasons to question a life long city hall insider who has little to show for all of those years milking the public Ron Kaye has a good article on Tom Labonge Carolyn Ramsay and their dirty smear tactics. Carolyn Koo-Koo Ramsay AKA CAROLYN MARY RAMSAY is busy earning over 80,000.00 a year and a fat pension while taking care of those well connected campaign contributors or as they like to call them these days constituents, but she took a break to email blast thousands of residents which Might be a violation of city ethics.

Tom is really earning his nickname Tom La-bozo these days!

 

City of Los Angeles, More Cost Less Service Let’s Keep LA Strong

Written by Dan Mariscal Street Services Employee and SEIU 721 Steward.

Our City Leadership has done a disservice to the residents and taxpayers of
the City of Los Angeles. Their idea of trying to fix the negligence and
incompetence of years of fiscal mismanagement, by blaming the City
employees, has taken it’s toll. Their solution? Balancing the budget on the
backs of the City’s workforce. But,  what effect does cutting and/or
diminishing the City’s workforce, by laying off and furloughing employees,
have on the quality of life in this once-great city?

See for yourself bone-jarring potholes going unfixed, sidewalks that are
trip-and-fall hazards, untrimmed City tree limbs embracing wires,
overflowing trash receptacles, streets going unswept for weeks and unsightly illegal dumping of trash. These conditions are city-wide.
How much money is spent by residents annually on car repair due to damages by potholes?

How much money has the City paid out to trip and fall lawsuits for the last
two years?

Does the City incur liability if an untrimmed tree falls on a homeowners
house?

Is this the direction where our City leadership is taking us?

Is this the kind of City we want our children to call home?

[slideshow id=1]

Did you know:

  • The Parking Lot Contractors were allowed to amass more than $445 million in back taxes owed to the City, and the City leadership, for some reason has failed or neglected to collect it. Yet the City leaders believe that more contracting out is a viable answer for the City’s budget crisis.
  • The City backed a $246 million tax break for a hotel complex in downtown
    Los Angeles.
  • An audit by City Controller Wendy Greuel for fiscal year 2008-09 showed
  • that only 53% of some $553 million in city billings was collected, resulting in a loss of $260 million….annually.
  • The Mayor’s anti-gang program (GRYD) was paid $525,000 to evaluate the program’s effectiveness but after a year has provided no results, according to City Controller Wendy Greuel.
  • In March of 2010 the City of Los Angeles received more than $500 million in ARRA federal stimulus money to create and/or retain jobs and avoid raising taxes, yet increased DWP rates and laid off hundreds of City
    employees.

Now is the time to stand for your City.
Please join us in calling your LA City Councilman and demand that they
restore the services that are being paid for by your tax dollars.

Help us keep LA strong.