Bob Schoonover Draws the line, NO MORE CONCESSIONS.

Bob Schoonover makes it clear in this piece he wrote, LA City Workers are done with concessions not just this budget year but next as well!
Read his great piece below.

Don’t Give Up on LA
LABOR
By Bob Schoonover

As of today, city workers are the only stakeholders who have taken aggressive and effective action to address the budget shortfall. Fitch’s last observations about the City’s finances note the coalition agreement as structural, substantive budget action. Even the LA Times begrudgingly acknowledged that LA’s frontline service workers have good ideas about delivering quality cost-effective services.

The labor agreement reached last fall with 22,000 city workers delayed four contractually obligated raises to workers in jobs as varied as these: librarians, refuse drivers, 911 police civilians, recreation & parks workers, sewer & wastewater workers, street services workers, zoo workers, police & fire mechanics, building trades workers, engineers, chemists, criminalists, and crossing guards to name a few.

We eliminated millions in overtime, agreed to limited unpaid hours off this year, and to increase our pension contributions. The immediate budget savings are $153 million this year, $323 million in the first two, and $2.12 billion over five years.

Since our members approved this agreement, the City has overspent budgeted expenditures by $98.7 million and approved raises to DWP workers that now endanger the utility’s ability to meet its commitment to the City of Los Angeles.

Some businesses propose a fire sale of City assets to themselves, and a reduction of City employee pay, benefits, and pensions to match what they would like to offer their own employees.

The CAO’s three-year budget proposal seeks to privatize the City’s Zoo, golf courses, parking lots, parking meters, maintenance including safety equipment and vehicles, Convention Center, ambulance billing, tree trimming, street sweeping, engineering, park maintenance, childcare services, arts, culture, & El Pueblo.

The City does not provide these services and maintain these facilities for profit. These are services and facilities that the public and the business community expect from a major city. LA workers will not stand for commercialization of municipal services, conversion of self-sustaining City assets to corporate cash cows, and loss of the facilities the City owns to line the pockets of LA’s richest suits.

The people of Los Angeles pay dearly for quality cost-effective city services and the workers of LA gave city management the tools they needed to make city government work the way it should – efficiently, publicly, focused and essential.

We expected retirements to occur randomly and all across the top levels of city government. Given that, we’ve encouraged smart, strategic consolidations of city functions.

Does it really make sense that seven different city departments trim trees – that LAWA contracts out tree trimming for a cost of $800 a tree while the CAO is proposing to offload tree trimming onto the fiscal backs of us home owners?

Now, I’m pretty conservative, but I believe trees belong to the whole City. It’s work that enhances public safety and the quality of LA life. The response of LA’s urban forestry workers during recent rains reminds all of us why it’s critical to have professional arborists and skilled city tree surgeons who cost considerably less than private tree work and provide reliable service.

Contracting just 10% of the tree work DWP contracts out would keep every city tree crew working for a year.

On Friday, the Mayor addressed union leaders at the County Federation of Labor. He was pressed by Cheryl Parisi, chair of the Coalition of City Unions, AFSCME 36 head:  “You come here to the House of Labor, talking about unavoidable layoffs. Yesterday, when you spoke in the Cathedral of Business, did you ask them to pony up with a 10% across-the-board cut to the $2.5 billion in private business done with the City of Los Angeles?”

He answered that in response to a question from David Abel, he announced that he was calling for a 20% cut in contracts. That’s good news because that’s worth $500 million. That matches the $400 – 600 million in reported outstanding debt owed to the City.

After the staff of the CAO’s office worked hard to process thousands of early retirement applications, LACERS dragged its bureaucratic feet then rewarded GM Sally Choi with a raise.

Last week, the LACERS board’s mayoral appointees hired an additional Assistant General Manager, not even affording that opportunity to someone struggling on the City’s beleaguered general fund.

Retiring all ERIP applicants within 30 days saves $22 million this year. Encouraging the retirement of an additional 300 applicants adds $10 million savings this year.

For 15 years traffic officers have advocated that the collection of parking tickets should be in-sourced. Two hundred twenty million of the City’s uncollected debt is uncollected parking ticket revenue. ACS, the company responsible for collecting parking tickets for the City, still owes the Department of Transportation $141 million in services and technology products.

City Attorneys represented by SEIU 721 will be meeting this week in part to identify ways they can help bolster collections. Ideas put forth by city workers are worth hundreds of millions in city services.

LA’s unions did not create this emergency, yet we are the first and only responders. The City has misinterpreted our forceful and massive relief effort as weakness. The City’s agreement with its unions protects coalition members from being laid off this fiscal year. The Mayor’s decision to devastate city services as he formulates his 2010-11 budget will cost the City added millions in deferred raises.

Our members have voted to give all they can afford to give. They say, “No more. We are tapped out.”

As a leader of these workers, I say, “NO MORE FROM US!”
We have given the City the flexibility, the tools, and the materials necessary to get this job done.

We don’t want to hear that we are now expendable and should be laid off. We want to see sensible actions and programs that use the City work force to get this city back on its feet.

(Bob Schoonover is President of SEIU Local 721; Heavy Duty Equipment Mechanic, General Services — 31 years)

Coalition of City Unions Agreement Puts everyone at risk

The Famous Friday Drop.

After everyones gone home for the night, surprise an email pops up near 9Pm.

In the Excuse filled email the latest contract agreement.

After carefully reviewing the New Revised Draft Agreement which supercedes are previous ERIP, and our current contract, one thing is clear.  Were Still Screwed!

We were fed half holidays unpaid, which came up to a couple hours, now we are forced to randomly take 3.5 hours Every Single pay period.

Coalition members will be Willingly Furloughed nearly Two Weeks – 59.5 Hours

Bonuses no longer compound losing there importance and recognition of the hazardous life threatening duties performed Costing Workers Thousands! LAPD Officers Would NEVER tolerate this.

NO CASH OVERTIME – Comp time only. Federal Limit of 240 hours.

NO RAISES – EAA MEMBERS GOT THERE RAISES

There are no Real tangible savings other then the Furloughs.

We continue to put off Real cost savings which will only make us suffer in the long term putting everyone’s future at risk. If the council isn’t told no you can’t continue to spend in this fashion, one day we will wake up to a headline blasting City of Los Angeles files for bankruptcy.

It is up to us to be responsible and Vote NO on this deal the furloughs are a given, but risking our financial future on the hope the city will magically come up with money in the next year and not spend it on more cops is foolish.

Consider this, LA City council instead of actually saving money by canceling the Police Academy Class has only delayed it in the hopes that if we give back all of these things in our contract we will allow them to continue spending at an unsustainable rate. No Other Union has had to give up this much, why are we giving away so much?

Paying more for Early Retirement and adding these latest concessions will leave us far behind other workers, and Sworn will continue to make out like bandits.

We Do NOT have to keep shouldering the costs for early retirements and our failed unions desperate attempt to save face.

Look at the numbers and the long term consequences of this deal.

If We VOTE NO:

We Get a +3.0% Retro Raise

We GET another 2.75% Raise in Two Months

We Keep our CASH Overtime.

We KEEP our pride, and our contract whole.

We will still have a contract after the economy improves, and we will be able to negotiate things that will prevent using employee wages as a savings account.

If we Don’t we are opening ourselves up to continued abuse and more of the same.

Employees will not have there retirement increased without proper bargaining.

If we Vote Yes we are setting ourselves back 30 years.

We are going to allow the city to transfer people against there will, we are hurting everything as a collective bargaining group we are suppose to stand for.

Stop getting used as an ATM.

City of Los Angeles and Coalition of LA Unions Conspire to keep Actuarial Study from reaching members prior to voting on contract.

City of Los Angeles and Coalition of LA Unions Conspire to keep Actuarial Study from reaching members prior to voting on contract.

Those are the latest accusations from employees forced to vote on ratifying there employment contracts.

Darren Whitfield a Spokesman for lacityworkers.com said, ” it’s inexcusable to force members to vote on an issue with such far reaching financial implications  in complete ignorance of the full financial ramifications.”

Lacers has not responded for comment, CAO representatives were unavailable after numerous requests, the Mayors office was silent on the matter referring calls to the CAO’s office, and the Company performing the Actuarial  Segal would only confirm that the Study was not near completion and had NO FURTHER COMMENT.

Actuarial Studies indicate such things as risk and financial viability.  Assumptions used can change the outcome dramatically, currently the issue of Public Pension funds using a return formula that is twice the rate of private pension funds is under scrutiny and could be reduced to match the private sector. Most people in the private industry conclude that using such a generous formula puts the retirement systems at risk of future failure from lack of funding.

Formulas used to determine the actual cost are also the cause of controversy because of the ease with which they are manipulated. Previous studies from Segal have come under scrutiny for failing to account for more then 1 scenario. 

LA union coalition members have been asked to vote without knowing the true cost of this plan and are ultimately responsible for repayment of the early retirement plan since the city has demanded it be cost neutral.

Under a worst case scenario city workers could be forced to pay up to 20% of there income towards this plan or take out loans in order to satisfy the repayment. These details seemed insignificant to mention to member’s as the only plan highlights were brief snippets of just how good the plan was. Current members have begun talking among themselves to determine a best course of action to prevent any plan such as this from getting a chance to see a vote without proper safeguards.

Some of the suggestions are .

  • City Clerk run Official Elections meeting the California, LA County , and City of La Election codes to prevent voter fraud
  • Forcing any  retirement plan programs such as the ERIP to meet full disclosure laws similar to SEC regulations.
  • Independent Actuarial Studies.
  • Requirements to Force a 2/3 majority vote before retirement incentives are approved when membership is Liable.
  • Require Full Disclosure of Facts when sending items to a vote.
  • Require a change to the administrative code forcing any union representing Los Angeles City Workers to face a reduction in members dues if they face a salary reduction.

These ideas have been brought forward due to the overwhelming bias and fraud that is underway in the current election which brings comparison to Saddam Hussein’s regime where 100% of the population voted 100% in favor of re-electing him to office.

Lacityworkers.com will keep you updated on the reform at city hall.

Prepare yourself for a Landslide victory in this so called election.

 

Here are some interesting links I found relating to retirement and erips etc.

http://itarumblings.blogspot.com/2008/05/lacers-early-retirement-window.html

http://ladailyblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/exclusive-villaraiogsa-budget-analysis.html

http://ronkayela.com/2009/06/heres-the-plan-is-it-good-for.html

New Contract posted- happy fourth

As I sit in isolation in the woods to grasp the full ramifications of this new contract, I look upon the giant pines I surround myself with.

Tall strong weathered majestic pines which have stood for hundreds of years some well before our great city was settled. I think to myself about this new contract that has been proposed and wonder why our union can’t stand strong and instead like a tree with no roots just simply topples over.

How many years have blue collar, and civilian workers been cast aside in order to please the politicians?
How many times have we as a group seen other bargaining units prosper at our expense?

When we were offered a decent contract, we felt appreciated, respected, only to ne the first to get dragged to the table under a false shared sacrafice plan.

Shared sacrafice is a really catchy phrase used to disguise a layoff list and departmental cutbacks. It’s own definition leads one to belive it is shared by all which it isn’t, sacrafice would be accurate in that civilian workers and there departments have been sacraficed in order to maintain Sworn employees high standards of living, cover there shortcomings and civil liabilitys, and prevent the elected politicians from having to make a choice between a new squad car or a janitor, new facility upgrades for those who work 3 days a week, or a handful of sweeper operators to clean our streets.

When sworn employees ask they recieve, when civilian ask they hear excuse after excuse. When the pot is only so big and so many hands reach for there piece of the pie it is the politicians who make the same choice to sacrafice the civilian to keep feeding the sworn beast time and again.

Some how it is ok to sacrafice the civilians, constantly taking hit after hit for others mistakes. How is anyone ever going to reform a department if they are never forced to answer for there mistakes? 13 million for the LAPD may day incident, 125 million for Rampart, Rodney King 3.8 million.
Reward for beating media 3-12 hour shifts. Obviously I do not want to single out our brothers in blue nor having
actually been working at the may day event care to pass judgment on those events but to point out the large sums of money that this enforcement machine sucks from the budget.

In the end these overruns come from general funds after there special funds and reserves are used up. Money that could have been used to pay for our salary increases and COLAS instead is used to pay for legal settlements.

Wouldn’t it be nice to have these sworn departments put off equipment upgrades, and suffer the pain or “Share the sacrafice” other departments are forced to make?

Instead budget trickery and contract renegotiation is the order of the day.

We as civilians are called upon to sacrafice yet again, upon looking at this latest contract redo by the council I look back upon the pine trees I surround myself with this holiday weekend, if We continue with the city, constantly giving up everything promised to us when will we get ahead? When will we stand tall like the mighty pine? Unfair, to say the least, poorly written, and lacking in any real protection this new contract reopening attempt is a huge step backwards!

Partially sharing the pain and to be left wide open for more abuse it is time we take a lesson from the mighty pine we stand firm and refuse to accept these miserable terms.
Let us go back to the table and work out these issues so that we can all prosper.

Take a look for yourself the new contract is posted in the forums section for all to read, please note the wording used, it is not what we have been told it would be if you don’t understand ask someone who does or send it over to your own lawyer ask him or her if it leaves you open or protects you.

Enjoy your holiday weekend.